Trump in 100 Days
April 30th, 2017
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/29/politics/trump-world-leaders-image-100-days/index.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trump-100-days-honeymoon-regrets-poll/story?id=46943338

http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/29/politics/trump-world-leaders-image-100-days/index.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trump-100-days-honeymoon-regrets-poll/story?id=46943338
The world has viewed Trump in the last 100 days as though he has done nothing to help the global problems taking place and especially within the last few weeks, he has caused more problems throughout the world. In the first article written by CNN, it goes into the very specifics of how certain countries viewed Trump's first 100 days. Because the authors of the article gave thirteen different countries points of view, I wouldn't say that it had much vagueness. However, there are still a few parts that can be more specific like when they talk about how H.R. McCaster "has hired a very bright woman to write the U.S. National Security Strategy" because "it's a tough job." This part is very vague to where the article authors did not elaborate at all about who the woman is and why the job is so hard that they can't hire just anyone. Most of this article did agree with Orwell's essay on how we as humans have adapted the English language to make it our own and almost use it in a lazier way. CNN especially used many weasel words to make sure they didn't seem like they were standing with or against one country. When talking about North Korea, they used lighter words like "worried" instead of frightened and "rattled" instead of a stronger word like "corruption." In the second article by ABC news, the article format is very similar to CNN because they both follow Orwell's essay on how he sees the English language. This article also uses vagueness when it talks about Trump's problems and his challenges because the article doesn't go into specifics, rather they are more specific on how Americans feel about him and how he has handled things these last 100 days. The article also uses weasel words when they talk about the people who don't support Trump, they refer to them as ones who are "rejecting Trump's criticism." Throughout both of these articles there are clear examples of weasel words and vagueness and because of this, the formatt of both of these articles agree with Orwell's essay on the english language.
Comments
Post a Comment